Effect of steel ball diameter in the surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) on microstructure, roughness, hardness and wear behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.

2 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

Abstract

Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT) is recognized as an effective technology for enhancing hardness and surface abrasion resistance. This study examined the influence of SMAT on the microstructure, surface roughness, hardness, and wear behavior of the AZ31 magnesium alloy. For the experiments, steel balls of different diameters – 3.2mm, 4mm, and 5.6mm – were used to perform the SMAT process, which was consistently timed at 8.5 minutes. Detailed analyses of the resultant microstructures were then conducted using tools such as a scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction. The hardness and wear were measured using the Vickers and the disk pin methods, respectively. It was observed that the SMAT process significantly reduced the grain size on the sample surfaces. For example, when a steel ball with a diameter of 5.6mm was utilized, the grain size was reduced from 225nm to just 96nm. The process also led to a substantial increase in hardness, with measurements rising from 65 HV to 190 HV, once again when a steel ball of 5.6mm diameter was utilized. Furthermore, the SMAT process, when executed with a tool diameter of 5.6mm, eliminated weight loss in the wear test, which had been previously recorded at 0.26mg, indicating an increase in surface abrasion resistance. An observed correlation suggested that as the tool diameters increased, the abrasion resistance of the surface improved. Abrasion was adhesive on untreated samples; on treated samples, it was ridged and scratched. However, as the tool diameter—and consequently, the surface hardness—increased, the scratches were seen to reduce gradually.

Keywords

References

 [1] Laleh, M., & Kargar, F. (2011). Effect of surface nanocrystallization on the microstructural and corrosion characteristics of AZ91D magnesium alloy. Journal of alloys and compounds, 509(37), 9150-9156.
[2] Fouad, Y., & El Batanouny, M. (2011). Effect of surface treatment on wear behavior of magnesium alloy AZ31. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 50(1), 19-22.
[3] Xu, C., Sheng, G., Sun, Y., Yuan, X., & Jiao, Y. (2018). Microstructure and mechanical properties of high-energy shot-peened Mg/Ti weldments. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 23(1), 28-34
[4] Laleh, M. (2010). a. S. Rouhaghdam, T. Shahrabi, a. Shanghi, Effect of alumina sol addition to micro-arc oxidation electrolyte on the properties of MAO coatings formed on magnesium alloy AZ91D. J. Alloys Compd, 496, 548-552.
[5] Xu, K., Wang, A., Wang, Y., Dong, X., Zhang, X., & Huang, Z. (2009). Surface nanocrystallization mechanism of a rare earth magnesium alloy induced by HVOF supersonic microparticles bombarding. Applied surface science, 256(3), 619-626.
[6] Hwang, D. Y., Kim, Y. M., Park, D. Y., Yoo, B., & Shin, D. H. (2009). Corrosion resistance of oxide layers formed on AZ91 Mg alloy in KMnO4 electrolyte by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Electrochimica acta, 54(23), 5479-5485.
[7] Mueller, K., & Mueller, S. (2007). Severe plastic deformation of the magnesium alloy AZ31. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 187, 775-779.
[8] Hassani-Gangaraj, S. M., Cho, K. S., Voigt, H. J., Guagliano, M., & Schuh, C. A. (2015). Experimental assessment and simulation of surface nanocrystallization by severe shot peening. Acta Materialia, 97, 105-115.
[9] Wang, Z. B., Tao, N. R., Tong, W. P., Lu, J., & Lu, K. (2003). Diffusion of chromium in nano-crystalline iron produced by means of surface mechanical attrition treatment. Acta Materialia, 51(14), 4319-4329.
[10] Tao, N. R., Wang, Z. B., Tong, W. P., Sui, M. L., Lu, J., & Lu, K. (2002). An investigation of surface nanocrystallization mechanism in Fe induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Acta materialia, 50(18), 4603-4616.
[11] Li, W., Liu, P., Ma, F., Liu, X., & Rong, Y. (2011). High-temperature surface alloying of nano-crystalline nickel produced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Journal of alloys and compounds, 509(2), 518-522.
[12] Nazari, F., Honarpisheh, M., & Zhao, H. (2021). Effect of the uncertainty of multi-cut contour method and friction coefficient on residual stresses of constrained groove pressing process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 235(11), 2039-2052.
[13] Nazari, F., Honarpisheh, M., & Zhao, H. (2020). The effect of microstructure parameters on the residual stresses in the ultrafine-grained sheets. Micron, 132, 102843.
[14] Khanlari, H., & Honarpisheh, M. (2020). Investigation of microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stress in non-equal-channel angular pressing of 6061 aluminum alloy. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 73(5), 1109-1121.
[15] Moazam, M. A., & Honarpisheh, M. (2019). Ring-core integral method to measurement residual stress distribution of Al-7075 alloy processed by cyclic close die forging. Materials Research Express, 6(8), 0865j3.
[16] Moazam, M. A., & Honarpisheh, M. (2021). Improving the mechanical properties and reducing the residual stresses of AA7075 by combination of cyclic close die forging and precipitation hardening. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 235(3), 542-549.
[17] Moazam, M. A., & Honarpisheh, M. (2020). The effects of combined cyclic close die forging and aging process on microstructure and mechanical properties of AA7075. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 234(9), 1242-1251.
[18] Honarpisheh, M., Haghighat, E., & Kotobi, M. (2018). Investigation of residual stress and mechanical properties of equal channel angular rolled St12 strips. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 232(10), 841-851.
[19] Ke, L. U., & Jian, L. U. (1999). Surface nanocrystallization (SNC) of metallic materials-presentation of the concept behind a new approach. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 15(3), 193-197.
[20] Lu, K. A. L. J., & Lu, J. (2004). Nanostructured surface layer on metallic materials induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 375, 38-45.
[21] Samih, Y., Beausir, B., Bolle, B., & Grosdidier, T. (2013). In-depth quantitative analysis of the microstructures produced by Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT). Materials characterization, 83, 129-138.
[22] Wua, X., Jianga, P., Chena, L., Yuana, F., & Zhub, Y. T. (2014). Extraordinary strain hardening by gradient structure. PNAS, 111(20), 7197-7201.
[23] Xu, J. M., Liu, Y., Jin, B., Li, J. X., Zhai, S. M., Yang, X. J., & Lu, J. (2015). Thermal stability of nano-crystalline AZ31 magnesium alloy fabricated by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 28(9), 1162-1169.
[24] Liu, X. C., Zhang, H. W., & Lu, K. (2013). Strain-induced ultrahard and ultrastable nanolaminated structure in nickel. Science, 342(6156), 337-340.
[25] Lu, K. (2014). Making strong nanomaterials ductile with gradients. Science, 345(6203), 1455-1456.
[26] Lu, K. A. L. J., & Lu, J. (2004). Nanostructured surface layer on metallic materials induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 375, 38-45.
[27] Hu, Tao, C. S. Wen, G. Y. Sun, S. L. Wu, C. L. Chu, Z. W. Wu, G. Y. Li, J. Lu, K. W. K. Yeung, and Paul K. Chu (2010). Wear resistance of NiTi alloy after surface mechanical attrition treatment. Surface and coatings technology, 205(2), 506-510.
[28] Meng, X., Duan, M., Luo, L., Zhan, D., Jin, B., Jin, Y., & Lu, J. (2017). The deformation behavior of AZ31 Mg alloy with surface mechanical attrition treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 707, 636-646.
[29] Sun, H. Q., Shi, Y. N., & Zhang, M. X. (2008). Wear behavior of AZ91D magnesium alloy with a nano-crystalline surface layer. Surface and Coatings Technology, 202(13), 2859-2864.
[30] Jiang, P., Lu, J., & Wu, X. L. (2011). Microstructure evolution and tensile properties of 304l stainless steel subjected to surface mechanical attrition treatment. In Materials Science Forum (Vol. 667, pp. 175-179). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
[31] Zhang, H. W., Hei, Z. K., Liu, G., Lu, J., & Lu, K. (2003). Formation of nanostructured surface layer on AISI 304 stainless steel by means of surface mechanical attrition treatment. Acta materialia, 51(7), 1871-1881.
[32] Lu, S., Wang, Z., & Lu, K. (2010). Strain-induced microstructure refinement in a tool steel subjected to surface mechanical attrition treatment. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 26(3), 258-263.
[33] Sun, Y. (2013). Sliding wear behaviour of surface mechanical attrition treated AISI 304 stainless steel. Tribology International, 57, 67-75.
[34] Wang, K., Tao, N. R., Liu, G., Lu, J., & Lu, K. (2006). Plastic strain-induced grain refinement at the nanometer scale in copper. Acta materialia, 54(19), 5281-5291.
[35] Zhu, K. Y., Vassel, A., Brisset, F., Lu, K., & Lu, J. (2004). Nanostructure formation mechanism of α-titanium using SMAT. Acta materialia, 52(14), 4101-4110.
[36] Haghighi, O., Amini, K., & Gharavi, F. (2020). Effect of Shot Peening Operation on the Microstructure and Wear Behavior of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy. Protection of Metals and Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, 56(1), 164-168.
[37] Balusamy, T., Narayanan, T. S., & Ravichandran, K. (2012). Effect of surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) on boronizing of EN8 steel. Surface and Coatings Technology, 213, 221-228.
[38] Bagherifard, S., Hickey, D. J., Fintová, S., Pastorek, F., Fernandez-Pariente, I., Bandini, M., ... & Guagliano, M. (2018). Effects of nanofeatures induced by severe shot peening (SSP) on mechanical, corrosion and cytocompatibility properties of magnesium alloy AZ31. Acta biomaterialia, 66, 93-108.
Journal of Ultrafine Grained and Nanostructured Materials
Volume 56, Issue 1
June 2023
Pages 68-74

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 January 2023
  • Revise Date: 02 June 2023
  • Accept Date: 02 June 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics