Effect of solvent’s types on the structure and magnetic properties of the as-coprecipitated Fe3O4 nanoparticles

Document Type: Research Paper


School of Metallurgy & Materials Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran.


Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles were synthesized by coprecipitation route. Coprecipitation is a simple, reproducible and accessible technique relying on the coprecipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ cations by NaOH as base at low temperature (~80 °C). In this work, the role of different solvents (H2O, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol) on phase, structure, microstructure and magnetic properties were characterized by X-ray diffractometry, electron microscopy and vibrating sample magnetometry techniques. Single phase Fe3O4 nanoparticles were crystallized in water and organic solvents. The particle size decreased from 53 to 33 nm by precipitating in the presence of organic solvents in contrast to water due to the introduction of more nucleation of particles caused by decrease in surface energy. Furthermore, the organic solvents prevent particle growth by adsorbing on the nucleus surface, leading to smaller particles. The as-coprecipitated Fe3O4 nanoparticles exhibited ferromagnetic behavior without any coercivity, confirming the superparamagnetism. The maximum saturation magnetization (Ms) of 54 emu/g was achieved for the as-coprecipitated Fe3O4 nanoparticles using ethylene glycol as solvent, possibly due to their higher crystallinity. However, the Ms decreased to 41 and 45 emu/g for precipitation in the presence of diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol, respectively, due to the more particle size reduction, leading to the spin canting on the particle surface.


  1. Kefeni KK, Msagati TAM, Mamba BB. Ferrite nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterisation and applications in electronic device. Materials Science and Engineering: B. 2017;215:37-55.
  2. Kobayashi T. Cancer hyperthermia using magnetic nanoparticles. Biotechnology Journal. 2011;6(11):1342-7.
  3. Liu T-Y, Hu S-H, Liu D-M, Chen S-Y, Chen IW. Biomedical nanoparticle carriers with combined thermal and magnetic responses. Nano Today. 2009;4(1):52-65.
  4. Guo CX, Huang S, Lu X. A solventless thermolysis route to large-scale production of ultra-small hydrophilic and biocompatible magnetic ferrite nanocrystals and their application for efficient protein enrichment. Green Chemistry. 2014;16(5):2571.
  5. Gonzales-Weimuller M, Zeisberger M, Krishnan KM. Size-dependant heating rates of iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic fluid hyperthermia. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2009;321(13):1947-50.
  6. Cushing BL, Kolesnichenko VL, O'Connor CJ. Recent Advances in the Liquid-Phase Syntheses of Inorganic Nanoparticles. Chemical Reviews. 2004;104(9):3893-946.
  7. Alp E, Aydogan N. A comparative study: Synthesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in air and N 2 atmosphere. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2016;510:205-12.
  8. Shahjuee T, Masoudpanah SM, Mirkazemi SM. Thermal Decomposition Synthesis of MgFe2O4 Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism. 2018.
  9. Asuha S, Wan HL, Zhao S, Deligeer W, Wu HY, Song L, et al. Water-soluble, mesoporous Fe3O4: Synthesis, characterization, and properties. Ceramics International. 2012;38(8):6579-84.
  10. Jolivet J-P, Tronc É, Chanéac C. Synthesis of iron oxide-based magnetic nanomaterials and composites. Comptes Rendus Chimie. 2002;5(10):659-64.
  11. Dickman MH. Book Review: Metal Oxide Chemistry and Synthesis. From Solution to Solid State. By Jean-Pierre Jolivet. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2001;40(13):2549-50.
  12. Lee J, Isobe T, Senna M. Preparation of Ultrafine Fe3O4Particles by Precipitation in the Presence of PVA at High pH. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1996;177(2):490-4.
  14. Montazeri-Pour M, Ataie A, Nikkhah-Moshaie R. Synthesis of Nano-Crystalline Barium Hexaferrite Using a Reactive Co-Precipitated Precursor. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2008;44(11):4239-42.
  15. Zhang X, Liu J, Yu H, Yang G, Wang J, Yu Z, et al. Enhanced electrochemical performances of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 spinel via ethylene glycol-assisted synthesis. Electrochimica Acta. 2010;55(7):2414-7.
  16. Zhuang L, Zhang W, Zhao Y, Shen H, Lin H, Liang J. Preparation and Characterization of Fe3O4 Particles with Novel Nanosheets Morphology and Magnetochromatic Property by a Modified Solvothermal Method. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1).
  17. Akbari S, Masoudpanah SM, Mirkazemi SM, Aliyan N. PVA assisted coprecipitation synthesis and characterization of MgFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles. Ceramics International. 2017;43(8):6263-7.
  18. Mozaffari S, Li W, Thompson C, Ivanov S, Seifert S, Lee B, et al. Colloidal nanoparticle size control: experimental and kinetic modeling investigation of the ligand–metal binding role in controlling the nucleation and growth kinetics. Nanoscale. 2017;9(36):13772-85.
  19. Parnianfar H, Masoudpanah SM, Alamolhoda S, Fathi H. Mixture of fuels for solution combustion synthesis of porous Fe 3 O 4 powders. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2017;432:24-9.
  20. Kim W, Suh C-Y, Cho S-W, Roh K-M, Kwon H, Song K, et al. A new method for the identification and quantification of magnetite–maghemite mixture using conventional X-ray diffraction technique. Talanta. 2012;94:348-52.
  21. Abdel‐Mohsen FF, Emira HS. The effect of starting materials and preparation process on the properties of magnesium ferrite pigment. Pigment & Resin Technology. 2005;34(6):312-20.
  22. Kim J-H, Kim S-M, Kim Y-I. Properties of Magnetic Nanoparticles Prepared by Co-Precipitation. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2014;14(11):8739-44.
  23. Reza Barati M, Selomulya C, Suzuki K. Particle size dependence of heating power in MgFe2O4 nanoparticles for hyperthermia therapy application. Journal of Applied Physics. 2014;115(17):17B522.