Effects of Fluid Environment Properties on the Nonlinear Vibrations of AFM Piezoelectric Microcantilevers

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

2 Department of Engineering Science, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, East of Guilan, University of Guilan, Rudsar-Vajargah, Iran.

Abstract

Nowadays, atomic-force microscopy plays a significant role in nanoscience and nanotechnology, and is widely used for direct measurement at atomic scale and scanning the sample surfaces. In tapping mode, the microcantilever of atomic-force microscope is excited at resonance frequency. Therefore, it is important to study its resonance. Moreover, atomic-force microscopes can be operated in fluid environments such as their applications in chemical and biological sensors. Additionally, piezoelectric microcantilevers are used to enhance atomic-force microscope scanning. Motivated by these considerations, presented herein is a finite element investigation into the nonlinear vibration behavior of piezoelectric microcantilever of atomic-force microscopes in fluid environment. For this purpose, a 3D finite element model coupled with a computational fluid dynamics model is introduced based upon a fluid-solid interaction analysis. First, the reliability of present fluid-solid interaction analysis is revealed by comparison with experimental data available in the literature. Then, numerical results are presented to study the influences of fluid dynamic viscosity and density on the resonance frequency, resonance amplitude and time response of piezoelectric microcantilever. It was shown that increasing the fluid density and dynamic viscosity results in the decrease of resonance frequency. For example, for density equal to 1000 kg/m3 , increasing the viscosity of fluid environment from 0.1 to 1, 10 and 20 mPa.s leads to decrease of resonance frequency about 3%, 29% and 42%, respectively. Also, the resonance amplitude of microcantilever increases as the density increases, while increasing dynamic viscosity has a decreasing effect on the resonance amplitude.

Keywords

References

1. Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C. Atomic Force Microscope. Physical Review Letters. 1986;56(9):930-3.
2. Mazeran PE, Loubet JL. Tribology Letters. 1999;7(4):199-212.
3. Rugar D, Hansma P. Atomic Force Microscopy. Physics Today. 1990;43(10):23-30.
4. Matthews A, Holmberg K. Preface. Coatings Tribology - Properties, Techniques and Applications in Surface Engineering: Elsevier; 1994. p. vii.
5. Nanotribology and Nanomechanics. Springer-Verlag; 2005.
6. Davis ZJ, Abadal G, Hansen O, Borisé X, Barniol N, Pérez-Murano F, et al. AFM lithography of aluminum for fabrication of nanomechanical systems. Ultramicroscopy. 2003;97(1-4):467-72.
7. Dufrêne YF, Ando T, Garcia R, Alsteens D, Martinez-Martin D, Engel A, et al. Imaging modes of atomic force microscopy for application in molecular and cell biology. Nature Nanotechnology. 2017;12(4):295-307.
8. Sitti M. Nanotribological characterization system by AFM based controlled pushing. Proceedings of the 2001 1st IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology IEEE-NANO 2001 (Cat No01EX516): IEEE.
9. Lekka M, Wiltowska-Zuber J. Biomedical applications of AFM. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2009;146:012023.
10. Obiols-Rabasa M, Oncins G, Sanz F, Tadros TF, Solans C, Levecke B, et al. Investigation of the elastic and adhesion properties of adsorbed hydrophobically modified inulin films on latex particles using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2017;524:185-92.
11. Fang T-H, Chang W-J. Effects of AFM-based nanomachining process on aluminum surface. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 2003;64(6):913-8.
12. Fang T-H, Chang W-J, Weng C-I. Nanoindentation and nanomachining characteristics of gold and platinum thin films. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2006;430(1-2):332-40.
13. Jalili N, Laxminarayana K. A review of atomic force microscopy imaging systems: application to molecular metrology and biological sciences. Mechatronics. 2004;14(8):907-45.
14. Salehi, Mi., Marashi, P., Salehi, Ma., and Ghannad, R., 2014, “Optimization of the FeCo nanowire fabrication embedded in anodic aluminum oxide template by response surface methodology,” J. Ultrafine Grained Nanostruct. Mater., 47, pp. 27-35.
15. Itoh T, Suga T. Development of a force sensor for atomic force microscopy using piezoelectric thin films. Nanotechnology. 1993;4(4):218-24.
16. Itoh T, Suga T. Force sensing microcantilever using sputtered zinc oxide thin film. Applied Physics Letters. 1994;64(1):37-9.
17. Lee C, Itoh T, Suga T. Self-excited piezoelectric PZT microcantilevers for dynamic SFM—with inherent sensing and actuating capabilities. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 1999;72(2):179-88.
18. Rogers B, Manning L, Sulchek T, Adams JD. Erratum to “Improving tapping mode atomic force microscopy with piezoelectric cantilevers” [Ultramicroscopy 100 (2004) 267–276]. Ultramicroscopy. 2005;103(3):251-2.
19. Bhatia D, Sharma H, Meena RS, Palkar VR. A novel ZnO piezoelectric microcantilever energy scavenger: Fabrication and characterization. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research. 2016;9:45-52.
20. Zhong Q, Inniss D, Kjoller K, Elings VB. Fractured polymer/silica fiber surface studied by tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Surface Science. 1993;290(1-2):L688-L92.
21. Turner JA, Hirsekorn S, Rabe U, Arnold W. High-frequency response of atomic-force microscope cantilevers. Journal of Applied Physics. 1997;82(3):966-79.
22. Dupas E, Gremaud G, Kulik A, Loubet JL. High-frequency mechanical spectroscopy with an atomic force microscope. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2001;72(10):3891-7.
23. García R. Dynamic atomic force microscopy methods. Surface Science Reports. 2002;47(6-8):197-301.
24. Putman CAJ, Van der Werf KO, De Grooth BG, Van Hulst NF, Greve J. Tapping mode atomic force microscopy in liquid. Applied Physics Letters. 1994;64(18):2454-6.
25. Song Y, Bhushan B. Finite-element vibration analysis of tapping-mode atomic force microscopy in liquid. Ultramicroscopy. 2007;107(10-11):1095-104.
26. Mahmoodi SN, Afshari M, Jalili N. Nonlinear vibrations of piezoelectric microcantilevers for biologically-induced surface stress sensing. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 2008;13(9):1964-77.
27. Mahmoodi SN, Jalili N. Piezoelectrically actuated microcantilevers: An experimental nonlinear vibration analysis. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 2009;150(1):131-6.
28. Delnavaz A, Mahmoodi SN, Jalili N, Mahdi Ahadian M, Zohoor H. Nonlinear vibrations of microcantilevers subjected to tip-sample interactions: Theory and experiment. Journal of Applied Physics. 2009;106(11):113510.
29. Korayem MH, Ghaderi R. Vibration response of a piezoelectrically actuated microcantilever subjected to tip–sample interaction. Scientia Iranica. 2013.
30. Ito S, Unger S, Schitter G. Vibration isolator carrying atomic force microscope’s head. Mechatronics. 2017;44:32-41.
31. Korayem AH, Korayem MH. The effect of surface roughness on the vibration behavior of AFM piezoelectric MC in the vicinity of sample surface in air environment based on MCS theory. Precision Engineering. 2017;47:212-22.
32. Drake B, Prater C, Weisenhorn A, Gould S, Albrecht T, Quate C, et al. Imaging crystals, polymers, and processes in water with the atomic force microscope. Science. 1989;243(4898):1586-9.
33. Weisenhorn AL, Hansma PK, Albrecht TR, Quate CF. Forces in atomic force microscopy in air and water. Applied Physics Letters. 1989;54(26):2651-3.
34. Han W, Lindsay SM. Probing molecular ordering at a liquid-solid interface with a magnetically oscillated atomic force microscope. Applied Physics Letters. 1998;72(13):1656-8.
35. Bonaccurso E, Kappl M, Butt H. Thin liquid films studied by atomic force microscopy. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science. 2008;13(3):107-19.
36. Hansma PK, Cleveland JP, Radmacher M, Walters DA, Hillner PE, Bezanilla M, et al. Tapping mode atomic force microscopy in liquids. Applied Physics Letters. 1994;64(13):1738-40.
37. Basak S, Beyder A, Spagnoli C, Raman A, Sachs F. Hydrodynamics of torsional probes for atomic force microscopy in liquids. Journal of Applied Physics. 2007;102(2):024914.
38. Rankl C, Pastushenko V, Kienberger F, Stroh CM, Hinterdorfer P. Hydrodynamic damping of a magnetically oscillated cantilever close to a surface. Ultramicroscopy. 2004;100(3-4):301-8.
39. Christov NC, Danov KD, Zeng Y, Kralchevsky PA, von Klitzing R. Oscillatory Structural Forces Due to Nonionic Surfactant Micelles: Data by Colloidal−Probe AFM vs Theory. Langmuir. 2010;26(2):915-23.
40. Vázquez J, Rivera MA, Hernando J, Sánchez-Rojas JL. Dynamic response of low aspect ratio piezoelectric microcantilevers actuated in different liquid environments. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. 2008;19(1):015020.
41. Korayem MH, Ghaderi R. Vibration response of an atomic force microscopy  piezoelectrically actuated microcantilever in liquid environment. Micro & Nano Letters. 2013;8(5):229-33.
42. Nima Mahmoodi S, Jalili N. Non-linear vibrations and frequency response analysis of piezoelectrically driven microcantilevers. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics. 2007;42(4):577-87.
43. Korayem MH, Korayem AH, Hosseini Hashemi S. Analysis of hysteresis effect on the vibration motion of a bimodal non-uniform micro-cantilever using MCS theory. Applied Physics A. 2016;122(2).
44. Mahmoodi SN, Jalili N. Coupled Flexural-Torsional Nonlinear Vibrations of Piezoelectrically Actuated Microcantilevers With Application to Friction Force Microscopy. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. 2008;130(6):061003.
 
Journal of Ultrafine Grained and Nanostructured Materials
Volume 50, Issue 2
December 2017
Pages 117-123

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 10 June 2017
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2017
  • Accept Date: 24 November 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics