Cytocompatibility of a 3- Dimensional Graphene Oxide/ Laminin Composite Scaffold Intended for Nerve Tissue Engineering

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Food and Drug Research Center, Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Biomaterials, Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, Tehran, Iran

3 Faculty of Life Science Engineering, College of Interdisciplinary Science and technology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jufgnsm.2025.02.11

Abstract

In this study, we fabricated porous and low-molecular-weight graphene oxide (GO) aerogel scaffolds via a single-step chemical reduction of GO with ethylene diamine (EDA) at 95°C for 6 hours, followed by freeze-drying. The concentrations of GO (3–8 mg/ml) and EDA (20–50 µl) were optimized using Design of Experiments (DOE) to control scaffold density and porosity. The scaffold featuring 5 mg/ml GO and 30 µl EDA exhibited optimal porous architecture with interconnected pores visible in SEM analysis and a low density of approximately 13 mg/cm³. Laminin coating was applied to enhance biological functionality.
Biocompatibility was confirmed using MTT assays with L929 fibroblast cells, showing 124% cell viability after 72 hours, indicating no cytotoxicity and even promotion of cell proliferation. P19 mouse embryonal carcinoma cells cultured on these scaffolds successfully differentiated into neural cells, as evidenced by the expression of microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2) confirmed via immunofluorescence staining. Quantitatively, neural differentiation efficiency on the scaffold reached approximately 80%, significantly higher compared to controls.
These results demonstrate that the developed GO aerogel scaffold possesses suitable mechanical properties, porosity, and bioactivity to support neural cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. The scaffold’s tunable density and porosity via GO and EDA concentrations provide a controllable microenvironment for neural tissue engineering applications. Future work will explore in vivo regenerative potential and electrical conductivity integration to further enhance nerve tissue repair.

Keywords

References

  1.  

    1. Ba, M. and F. Bonhoeffer, Perspectives on axonal regeneration in the mammalian CNS. Trends in neurosciences, 1994. 17(11): p. 473-479.
    2. Silver, J. and J.H. Miller, Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nature reviews neuroscience, 2004. 5(2): p. 146-156.
    3. Gu, X., F. Ding, and D.F. Williams, Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials, 2014. 35(24): p. 6143-6156.
    4. López‐Dolado, E., et al., Subacute tissue response to 3D graphene oxide scaffolds implanted in the injured rat spinal cord. Advanced healthcare materials, 2015. 4(12): p. 1861-1868.
    5. Misra, S.K., et al., Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) multifunctional composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials, 2010. 31(10): p. 2806-2815.
    6. Peter, M., et al., Novel biodegradable chitosan–gelatin/nano-bioactive glass ceramic composite scaffolds for alveolar bone tissue engineering. Chemical engineering journal, 2010. 158(2): p. 353-361.
    7. Li, N., et al., Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Scientific reports, 2013. 3(1): p. 1-6.
    8. Dastjerdi, R. and M. Montazer, A review on the application of inorganic nano-structured materials in the modification of textiles: focus on anti-microbial properties. Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2010. 79(1): p. 5-18.
    9. Karimi, Z., L. Karimi, and H. Shokrollahi, Nano-magnetic particles used in biomedicine: Core and coating materials. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2013. 33(5): p. 2465-2475.
    10. Hudson, T.W., G.R. Evans, and C.E. Schmidt, Engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair. Orthopedic Clinics, 2000. 31(3): p. 485-497.
    11. Evans, G.R., Peripheral nerve injury: a review and approach to tissue engineered constructs. The Anatomical Record: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 2001. 263(4): p. 396-404.
    12. Johnson, E.O. and P.N. Soucacos, Nerve repair: experimental and clinical evaluation of biodegradable artificial nerve guides. Injury, 2008. 39(3): p. 30-36.
    13. Shin, S.R., et al., Graphene-based materials for tissue engineering. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2016. 105: p. 255-274.
    14. Aydin, T., et al., Graphene based materials in neural tissue regeneration. Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 3, 2018: p. 129-142.
    15. Yang, K., et al., The influence of surface chemistry and size of nanoscale graphene oxide on photothermal therapy of cancer using ultra-low laser power. Biomaterials, 2012. 33(7): p. 2206-2214.
    16. Lee, W.C., et al., Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS nano, 2011. 5(9): p. 7334-7341.
    17. Allen, M.J., V.C. Tung, and R.B. Kaner, Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chemical reviews, 2010. 110(1): p. 132-145.
    18. Sotoudeh, A. and M. Amirmazlaghani, Graphene-based field effect diode. Superlattices and Microstructures, 2018. 120: p. 828-836.
    19. Ryu, S. and B.-S. Kim, Culture of neural cells and stem cells on graphene. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2013. 10(2): p. 39-46.
    20. Goenka, S., V. Sant, and S. Sant, Graphene-based nanomaterials for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Journal of Controlled Release, 2014. 173: p. 75-88.
    21. Novoselov, K.S., et al., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. science, 2004. 306(5696): p. 666-669.
    22. Zhang, L. and T.J. Webster, Nanotechnology and nanomaterials: promises for improved tissue regeneration. Nano today, 2009. 4(1): p. 66-80.
    23. Dvir, T., et al., Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues. Nano-Enabled Medical Applications, 2020: p. 351-382.
    24. Farokhzad, O.C. and R. Langer, Impact of nanotechnology on drug delivery. ACS nano, 2009. 3(1): p. 16-20.
    25. Nardecchia, S., et al., Three dimensional macroporous architectures and aerogels built of carbon nanotubes and/or graphene: synthesis and applications. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013. 42(2): p. 794-830.
    26. Meng, S., Nerve cell differentiation using constant and programmed electrical stimulation through conductive non-functional graphene nanosheets film. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2014. 11(4): p. 274-283.
    27. Tang, M., et al., Enhancement of electrical signaling in neural networks on graphene films. Biomaterials, 2013. 34(27): p. 6402-6411.
    28. Pampaloni, N.P., et al., Sculpting neurotransmission during synaptic development by 2D nanostructured interfaces. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 2018. 14(7): p. 2521-2532.
    29. Zhang, K., et al., Aligned PLLA nanofibrous scaffolds coated with graphene oxide for promoting neural cell growth. Acta biomaterialia, 2016. 37: p. 131-142.
    30. Huang, C., et al., Nerve guidance conduits from aligned nanofibers: improvement of nerve regeneration through longitudinal nanogrooves on a fiber surface. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2015. 7(13): p. 7189-7196.
    31. Novoselov, K.S., et al., A roadmap for graphene. nature, 2012. 490(7419): p. 192-200.
    32. Chiacchiaretta, M., et al., Graphene oxide upregulates the homeostatic functions of primary astrocytes and modulates astrocyte-to-neuron communication. Nano letters, 2018. 18(9): p. 5827-5838.
    33. Akhavan, O., et al., Accelerated differentiation of neural stem cells into neurons on ginseng-reduced graphene oxide sheets. Carbon, 2014. 66: p. 395-406.
    34. Song, J., et al., The preparation and characterization of polycaprolactone/graphene oxide biocomposite nanofiber scaffolds and their application for directing cell behaviors. Carbon, 2015. 95: p. 1039-1050.
    35. Tu, Q., et al., Effects of surface charges of graphene oxide on neuronal outgrowth and branching. Analyst, 2014. 139(1): p. 105-115.
    36. Kuila, T., et al., Chemical functionalization of graphene and its applications. Progress in Materials Science, 2012. 57(7): p. 1061-1105.
    37. Weaver, C.L. and X.T. Cui, Directed neural stem cell differentiation with a functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite. Advanced healthcare materials, 2015. 4(9): p. 1408-1416.
    38. Geetha Bai, R., et al., Graphene-based 3D scaffolds in tissue engineering: fabrication, applications, and future scope in liver tissue engineering. International journal of nanomedicine, 2019: p. 5753-5783.
    39. Chen, J., et al., Synthesis of graphene oxide sheets with controlled sizes from sieved graphite flakes. Carbon, 2016. 110: p. 34-40.
    40. Nourmohammadi, A., et al., Graphene oxide sheets involved in vertically aligned zinc oxide nanowires for visible light photoinactivation of bacteria. Journal of alloys and compounds, 2014. 612: p. 380-385.
    41. Rahmani, Z., et al., Nanoporous graphene and graphene oxide-coated polyurethane sponge as a highly efficient, superhydrophobic, and reusable oil spill absorbent. Journal of environmental chemical engineering, 2017. 5(5): p. 5025-5032.
    42. Hu, H., et al., The role of microwave absorption on formation of graphene from graphite oxide. Carbon, 2012. 50(9): p. 3267-3273.
    43. Hu, H., et al., Ultralight and highly compressible graphene aerogels. Advanced materials, 2013. 25(15): p. 2219-2223.
    44. Chen, W. and L. Yan, In situ self-assembly of mild chemical reduction graphene for three-dimensional architectures. Nanoscale, 2011. 3(8): p. 3132-3137.
    45. Xu, Y., et al., Self-assembled graphene hydrogel via a one-step hydrothermal process. ACS Nano, 2010. 4(7): p. 4324-30.
    46. Schaedler, T.A., et al., Ultralight metallic microlattices. Science, 2011. 334(6058): p. 962-965.
    47. Li, J., et al., Ultra-light, compressible and fire-resistant graphene aerogel as a highly efficient and recyclable absorbent for organic liquids. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2014. 2(9): p. 2934-2941.
    48. Kim, N.H., T. Kuila, and J.H. Lee, Simultaneous reduction, functionalization and stitching of graphene oxide with ethylenediamine for composites application. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013. 1(4): p. 1349-1358.
    49. Xu, Z., et al., Strong, conductive, lightweight, neat graphene aerogel fibers with aligned pores. ACS nano, 2012. 6(8): p. 7103-7113.
    50. Li, N., et al., Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Scientific reports, 2013. 3(1): p. 1604.
    51. Zhang, X., et al., Mechanically strong and highly conductive graphene aerogel and its use as electrodes for electrochemical power sources. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011. 21(18): p. 6494-6497.
    52. Marcano, D., et al., Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4:4806-4814. ACS nano, 2010. 4: p. 4806-14.
    53. Kang, M.S., et al., Graphene oxide-functionalized nanofibre composite matrices to enhance differentiation of hippocampal neuronal cells. Materials Advances, 2020. 1(9): p. 3496-3506.
    54. Qian, Y. and C. Fan. Multilayer integration manufacture of graphene oxide based nerve scaffold. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. IOP Publishing.
Journal of Ultrafine Grained and Nanostructured Materials
Volume 58, Issue 2
December 2025
Pages 264-276

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 June 2025
  • Revise Date: 08 September 2025
  • Accept Date: 24 September 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics